Election Authority Breaks Seals, Cuts Wires of Voting Systems
At a community engagement breakfast that took place on March 17th, 2023, Kurt Bahr, St. Charles County Election Director and his Deputy Director, Mark Parkinson admit on video that our voting system seals were broken and wires were physically cut.
Neither Kurt nor Mark reported or documented that they tampered with 100% of our election machines.
Election Authority BREAKS Seals, CUTS Wires of Voting Systems
At a community engagement breakfast that took place on March 17th, 2023, Kurt Bahr, St. Charles County Election Director and his Deputy Director, Mark Parkinson admit on video that our voting system seals were broken and wires were physically cut. Neither Kurt nor Mark reported or documented that they tampered with 100% of our election machines.
Election Authority BREAKS Seals, CUTS Wires of Voting Systems
At a community engagement breakfast that took place on March 17th, 2023, Kurt Bahr, St. Charles County Election Director and his Deputy Director, Mark Parkinson admit on video that they broke our voting system seals and physically cut wires.
Neither Kurt nor Mark reported or documented that they tampered with 100% of our election machines.
IS THIS A CRIME?
According to their own admissions, Bahr and Parkinson would be in direct violation of RSMo sections 115.631.16, 115.631.25, 115.633.2, and 115.635.11 per voting system altered.
As of November 2020, St. Charles County owned at least 371 voting systems that were purchased with “Zuckerbucks” via the CTCL Covid-19 Response Grant.
The offenses vary from misdemeanors to felonies, punishable by hefty fines and/or imprisonment upon conviction.
115.631. Class one election offenses. — The following offenses, and any others specifically so described by law, shall be class one election offenses and are deemed felonies connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage. Conviction for any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than five years or by fine of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars but not more than ten thousand dollars or by both such imprisonment and fine:
(16) Willfully tampering with, disarranging, altering the information on, defacing, impairing or destroying any voting machine or marking device after the machine or marking device has been prepared for use at an election and during the time it is required by law to remain locked and sealed with intent to impair the functioning of the machine or marking device at an election, mislead any voter at the election, or to destroy or change the count or record of votes on such machine;
(25) Engaging in any act of violence, destruction of property having a value of five hundred dollars or more, or threatening an act of violence with the intent of denying a person’s lawful right to vote or to participate in the election process;
115.633. Class two election offenses. — The following offenses, and any others specifically so described by law, shall be class two election offenses and are deemed felonies not connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage. Conviction for any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than five years or by fine of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars but not more than ten thousand dollars or by both such imprisonment and fine:
(2) Willfully tampering with, disarranging, defacing, materially altering, impairing, or destroying any voting machine or automatic tabulating equipment owned or leased by or loaned to an election authority.
115.635. Class three election offenses. — The following offenses, and any others specifically so described by law, shall be class three election offenses and are deemed misdemeanors connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage. Conviction for any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than one year or by fine of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars, or by both such imprisonment and fine:
(11) Attempting to commit or participating in an attempt to commit any class one or class two election offense.
IS THIS A CRIME?
According to their own admissions, Bahr and Parkinson would be in direct violation of RSMo sections 115.631.16, 115.631.25, 115.633.2, and 115.635.11 per voting system altered.
As of November 2020, St. Charles County owned at least 371 voting systems that were purchased with “Zuckerbucks” via the CTCL Covid-19 Response Grant.
The offenses vary from misdemeanors to felonies, punishable by hefty fines and/or imprisonment upon conviction.
115.631. Class one election offenses. — The following offenses, and any others specifically so described by law, shall be class one election offenses and are deemed felonies connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage. Conviction for any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than five years or by fine of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars but not more than ten thousand dollars or by both such imprisonment and fine:
(16) Willfully tampering with, disarranging, altering the information on, defacing, impairing or destroying any voting machine or marking device after the machine or marking device has been prepared for use at an election and during the time it is required by law to remain locked and sealed with intent to impair the functioning of the machine or marking device at an election, mislead any voter at the election, or to destroy or change the count or record of votes on such machine;
(25) Engaging in any act of violence, destruction of property having a value of five hundred dollars or more, or threatening an act of violence with the intent of denying a person’s lawful right to vote or to participate in the election process;
115.633. Class two election offenses. — The following offenses, and any others specifically so described by law, shall be class two election offenses and are deemed felonies not connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage. Conviction for any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than five years or by fine of not less than two thousand five hundred dollars but not more than ten thousand dollars or by both such imprisonment and fine:
(2) Willfully tampering with, disarranging, defacing, materially altering, impairing, or destroying any voting machine or automatic tabulating equipment owned or leased by or loaned to an election authority.
115.635. Class three election offenses. — The following offenses, and any others specifically so described by law, shall be class three election offenses and are deemed misdemeanors connected with the exercise of the right of suffrage. Conviction for any of these offenses shall be punished by imprisonment of not more than one year or by fine of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars, or by both such imprisonment and fine:
(11) Attempting to commit or participating in an attempt to commit any class one or class two election offense.
IS THIS A CRIME?
According to their own admissions, Bahr and Parkinson would be in direct violation of RSMo sections 115.631.16, 115.631.25, 115.633.2, and 115.635.11 per voting system altered. Offenses vary from misdemeanors to felonies, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment upon conviction.
As of November 2020, St. Charles County owned at least 371 voting systems that were purchased with “Zuckerbucks” via the CTCL Grant.
A NEW STORY EMERGES
When the public became aware of the admissions made by Bahr and Parkinson, massive public pressure was applied to St. Charles and Missouri elected officials demanding them to investigate and provide answers.
From there, a new story emerged. Kurt and Mark denied ever touching the machines. In a recorded call between Councilman Joe Brazil, Kurt Bahr and Mark Parkinson, they completely recanted everything they said in the meeting above, admitted to lying to “illicit a response from the expert.”
Full Phone Call Recording:
A NEW STORY EMERGES
When the public became aware of the admissions made by Bahr and Parkinson, massive calls for an investigation for answers. From there, a new story emerged. Kurt and Mark denied ever touching the machines. In a recorded call between Councilman Joe Brazil, Kurt Bahr and Mark Parkinson, they completely recanted everything they said in the meeting above, admitted to lying to “illicit a response from the expert.”
Full Phone Call Recording:
A New Story Emerges
When the public became aware of the admissions made by Bahr and Parkinson, there were massive calls for an investigation and answers
From there, a new story emerged. Kurt and Mark denied ever touching the machines. In a recorded call between Councilman Joe Brazil, Kurt Bahr and Mark Parkinson, they completely recanted everything they said in the meeting above, admitted to lying to “illicit a response from the expert.”
Full Phone Call Recording:
The Cover Up: Corruption From The Very Top
After an overwhelming response from the public demanding that Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft open a full investigation into the St. Charles County Election Authority, it took him over two months to release a response to Councilman Brazil’s complaint.
Insert: The Vendor Cover Up
The statement claimed no wrongdoing by Bahr and Parkinson, alleging that the modifications made to the voting systems were done by the “vendor of the equipment.”
The Cover Up: Corruption From The Very Top
After an overwhelming response from the public demanding that Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft open a full investigation into the St. Charles County Election Authority, it took him over two months to release a response to Councilman Brazil’s complaint.
Insert: The Vendor Cover Up
The statement claimed no wrongdoing by Bahr and Parkinson, alleging that the modifications made to the voting systems were done by the “vendor of the equipment.”
Corruption From The Top
After an overwhelming response from the public demanding that Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft open a full investigation into the St. Charles County Election Authority, it took him over two months to release a response to Councilman Brazil’s complaint.
Insert: The Vendor Cover Up
The statement claimed no wrongdoing by Bahr and Parkinson, alleging that the modifications made to the voting systems were done by the “vendor of the equipment.”
Nevermind what you just heard with your own two ears. The Secretary of State says everything is fine.
More Lies On Record
January 29th, 2024, Kurt Bahr went on public record at the St. Charles County Council Meeting to parrot Ashcroft’s statement
More Lies On Record
January 29th, 2024, Kurt Bahr went on public record at the St. Charles County Council Meeting to parrot Ashcroft’s statement
More Lies On Record
January 29th, 2024, Kurt Bahr went on public record at the St. Charles County Council Meeting to parrot Ashcroft’s statement.
The Problem With The Vendor Story
First, we have to believe that everything that Bahr and Parkinson claimed in the two hour long meeting on March 17, 2023 was false. That they lied at least seven times in that meeting to “provoke a response.” If you’re buying that, I have a bridge to sell you…
But say a vendor did come in and make the modifications. What would the requirements be by law?
Per HAVA: Not Legally ACCREDITED
According to an email to the council from Ali Graeff, the vendor Maintenance by Henry Adkins and Sons alleged by SOS Ashcroft claims in his letter is actually considered more than “maintenance” and would have required a complete recertification which was not done.
Admissions On Record
In the spring of 2024, Jay Ashcroft did a radio interview with Robb Carter on Real Talk 93.3 where he admits that some of the claims made in Graeff’s lawsuit were valid. The claims alleged that our elections are being illegally administered. Graeff’s evidence was never heard in a court of law due to lawfare tactics by Ashcroft.
The Problem With The Vendor Story
First, we have to believe that everything that Bahr and Parkinson claimed in the two hour long meeting on March 17, 2023 was false. That they lied at least seven times in that meeting to “provoke a response.” If you’re buying that, I have a bridge to sell you… But say a vendor did come in and make the modifications. What would the requirements be by law?
Per HAVA: Not Legally ACCREDITED
According to an email to the council from Ali Graeff, the vendor Maintenance by Henry Adkins and Sons alleged by SOS Ashcroft claims in his letter is actually considered more than “maintenance” and would have required a complete recertification which was not done.
Admissions On Record
In the spring of 2024, Jay Ashcroft did a radio interview with Robb Carter on Real Talk 93.3 where he admits that some of the claims made in Graeff’s lawsuit were valid.
The claims alleged that our elections are being illegally administered. Graeff’s evidence was never heard in a court of law due to lawfare tactics by Ashcroft.
The Problem With The Vendor Story
First, we have to believe that everything that Bahr and Parkinson claimed in the two hour long meeting on March 17, 2023 was false. That they lied at least seven times in that meeting to “provoke a response.” If you’re buying that, I have a bridge to sell you…
But say there was a vendor… What would the requirements be by law?
Not Legally Accredited
In an email sent to the council by Ali Graeff, she debunks SOS Ashcroft’s statement of no wrong doing citing the HAVA Act.
The alleged “maintenance” performed by the vendor is considered more than “maintenance” and would have required a complete recertification. The vendor, Henry Adkins and Sons are not legally accredited to issue that certification.
Admissions On Air
In the spring of 2024, Jay Ashcroft did a radio interview with Robb Carter on Real Talk 93.3 where he admits that some of the claims made in Graeff’s lawsuit were valid.
The claims alleged that our elections are being illegally administered. Graeff’s evidence was never heard in a court of law due to lawfare tactics by Ashcroft.
Meanwhile: Missouri is Being Targeted
For months, the nation has watched as weekly data released from The US Social Security Administration Website, HAVV shows MASSIVE amounts of people registering to vote WITHOUT ID.
Missouri has been in the top five states being targeted consistently for the majority of 2024.
Missouri Data as of October 14th, 2024:
Total in 2024:
New This Week:
Meanwhile: Missouri is Being Targeted
For months, the nation has watched as weekly data released from The US Social Security Administration Website, HAVV shows MASSIVE amounts of people registering to vote WITHOUT ID.
Missouri has been in the top five states being targeted consistently for the majority of 2024.
Missouri Data as of October 14th, 2024:
Total in 2024:
New This Week:
Meanwhile:
Missouri Is Being TARGETED
For months, the nation has watched as weekly data released from The US Social Security Administration Website, the Help America Vote Verification (HAVV) shows MASSIVE amounts of people registering to vote WITHOUT ID.
Missouri has been in the top five states being targeted consistently for the majority of 2024.
Missouri Data as of 10/14/24:
Total in 2024:
New This Week:
ZERO Action From State LEADERSHIP
Despite heavy public outcries, Secretary Ashcroft, Attorney General Bailey and Governor Parson have failed to take any action to secure our voter rolls.
This failure ultimately falls on our Secretary of State as he has the supreme aurhtority over our voter rolls, however, Attorney General Bailey could absolutely file a lawsuit to require action be taken. Their inaction is concerning to say the least.
The November 5th election is just weeks away and Missouri appears to be in big trouble. According to the United Sovereign Americans Scorecard, our state has already experienced massive voter fraud issues.
This is from the 2022 election – Before we had astronomical amounts of voter registrations WITHOUT ID.
ZERO Action From State LEADERSHIP
Despite heavy public outcries, Secretary Ashcroft, Attorney General Bailey and Governor Parson have failed to take any action to secure our voter rolls.
This failure ultimately falls on our Secretary of State as he has the supreme aurhtority over our voter rolls, however, Attorney General Bailey could absolutely file a lawsuit to require action be taken. Their inaction is concerning to say the least.
The November 5th election is just weeks away and Missouri appears to be in big trouble. According to the United Sovereign Americans Scorecard, our state has already experienced massive voter fraud issues.
This is from the 2022 election – Before we had astronomical amounts of voter registrations WITHOUT ID.
Ashcroft Claims “MISINFORMATION”
On September 25th, Secretary Ashcroft gave an interview on The Morning Crew with Dan & Drew where he was asked about the reporting being done on the HAVV data. Ashcroft claims that the data is being misinterpreted and calls it “misinformation”
Flaws in the System
In the same segment, Representative Holly Jones asks Ashcroft some key questions. He admits to her that there is no way to differentiate illegals applying for drivers license/non-drivers license/ID via the DMV. “We don’t necessarily fully know that.” Seems he’d rather kick the can and push for legislation.
Per the SSA.Gov, HAVV allows for a person to register to vote using the last four of a SSN. The truth remains – Missouri has the potential for MASSIVE voter fraud. Our state deserves better.
More Can Be Done: The S.A.V.E. Program
On September 26th, Senator Bill Eigel hand-delivered a request to the Department of Revenue asking for the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program data that already exists. This is a resource that Secretary Ashcroft could have been utilizing for years.
Ashcroft Claims “MISINFORMATION”
On September 25th, Secretary Ashcroft gave an interview on The Morning Crew with Dan & Drew where he was asked about the reporting being done on the HAVV data. Ashcroft claims that the data is being misinterpreted and calls it “misinformation”
Flaws in the System
In the same segment, Representative Holly Jones asks Ashcroft some key questions.
He admits to her that there is no way to differentiate illegals applying for drivers license/non-drivers license/ID via the DMV. “We don’t necessarily fully know that.” Seems he’d rather kick the can and push for legislation.
Per the SSA.Gov, HAVV allows for a person to register to vote using the last four of a SSN. The truth remains – Missouri has the potential for MASSIVE voter fraud. Our state deserves better.
More Can Be Done: The S.A.V.E. Program
On September 26th, Senator Bill Eigel hand-delivered a request to the Department of Revenue asking for the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program data that already exists. This is a resource that Secretary Ashcroft could have been utilizing for years.
Zero Action From State Leadership
Despite heavy public outcries, Secretary Ashcroft, Attorney General Bailey and Governor Parson have failed to take any action to secure our voter rolls.
This failure ultimately falls on our Secretary of State as he has the supreme authority over our voter rolls, however, Attorney General Bailey could absolutely file a lawsuit to require action. Our Governor could also make a public request for action to be taken. Their inaction is concerning to say the least. The November 5th election is just weeks away and Missouri appears to be in big trouble.
According to the United Sovereign American’s scorecard, our state has already experienced massive voter fraud issues.
This is from 2022 – Before astronomical numbers of registrations WITHOUT ID.
Ashcroft Claims “Misinformation”
On September 25th, Secretary Ashcroft went on The Morning Crew with Dan & Drew Show where he was asked about the reporting being done on the HAVV data. Ashcroft claims that the data is being misinterpreted and calls it “misinformation”
Flaws In The System
In the same segment, Representative Holly Jones asks Ashcroft some key questions.
He admits to her that there is no way to differentiate illegals applying for drivers license/non-drivers license/ID via the DMV. “We don’t necessarily fully know that.” Seems he’d rather kick the can and push for legislation.
Per the SSA.Gov, HAVV allows for a person to register to vote using the last four of a SSN.
The truth remains –
Missouri has the potential for MASSIVE voter fraud. Our state deserves better.
More Can Be Done: The S.A.V.E. Program
On September 26th, Senator Bill Eigel hand-delivered a request to the Dept. of Revenue asking for the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) Program data.
With this is a program, the data needed already exists. Secretary Ashcroft could have been utilizing the S.A.V.E. Program for years.
Take Action
Contact Your Elected Officials –Tell them more expect MORE!
IN THE NEWS TODAY
View the latest local and statewide election news.
IN THE NEWS TODAY
View the latest local and statewide election news.
IN THE NEWS TODAY
CONTACT US
CONTACT US
Reach out with questions, concerns and tips!
Reach out with questions, concerns and tips!
